In keeping with the program set out in the book “Two sciences of
mind”, this conference distinguishes between foundational issues related
to cognition, to be discussed on the first day, and those related to
consciousness. The motivation for this division is primarily procedural;
it is proposed that there are myriad issues associated with each that
can be approached separately before an integrative strategy can succeed.
In particular, it is suggested that the failure of fields like natural
language processing to solve their fundamental problems are due to a
mistaken assumption of linearity. Likewise, and perhaps related,
consciousness studies continues to attempt to reduce our
being-in-the-world to psychological processes, in the hope that an
expanded concept of information will solve everything. In the vacua that
have emerged, charlatans abound with nostrums about neuroplastcity, the
“content industry” and oner-interpretation of single findings like
those from mirror neurons retarding real neuroscience.
It is proposed that cognitive science must reflect, and equal in
complexity, all explanation patterns attested in third-person science.
Yet such third-person science involves constructs like vectors and
curved space that would seem to be outside the explanatory ambit of
scalar methods like fmri. In fact, for cognitive science to succeed in
completing the cycle of explanation of the sciences, it must use all
representational structures used in the academy.
Further cognitive themes can be found at http://cssi32.blogspot.com/
This will be held Mar 6-7 2014, Sproul Room at international house at UC
Berkeley with Skype links to participants who cannot travel to the
event
Speakers:
Henry Stapp (LBNL, UC Berkeley)
Ed Vul (UCSD)
Jacob Needleman (SFSU)
Jerome Feldman (ICSI, UC Berkeley)
Tom Griffiths (UC Berkeley)
Robert Campbell (Clemson U)
Mike Cole (UCSD)
José Acacio de Barros (SFSU/Stanford)
Christian de Quincey (JFK)
Sean O Nuallain (UoI)
Fr. Robert Spitzer (Magis institute)
Bernard Haisch (ManyOne Networks )
Interested in doing a full-time course? Visit universityofireland.com
Consciousness studies has surely been one of the main intellectual
failures of the past 20 years; there seems still to be a proclivity to
attempt to identify consciousness with its content, and that in turn
with an entangled nexus bathing us rather like amniotic fluid. On the
second day, we propose distinguishing discussing consciousness from its
content, and to explicate its relationship with the arts, with science,
with political activism, and with religion, particularly in the context
of fine-tuning.
Further themes can be found at http://bionoetics.blogspot.com/
Inquiries and submissions for the conference to eireann@yahoo.com; the
deadline for conference abstracts (max 750 words) is Feb 1 2014, 5pm
GMT. Please note that we welcome papers that disagree with the premises
of the workshop; the goal is to have a lively and informed debate.
We also welcome proposals for programme committee members, panellists and indeed plenary speakers
ihprograms@berkeley.edu, 510-642-9460
No comments:
Post a Comment