Intellectual property and other information policies in a small country
Seán Ó Nualláin Ph.D.
Lead IP adviser,
3pm Feb 13 2015 107 South hall UC Berkeley
Even in the depths of the recent recession, smaller and economically challenged countries kept scientific research programs that attempt to replicate the NSF and NIH running. The current bloat in scientific journals allowed the system to be gamed to make this appear a reasonable step. The first part of this talk focuses on three burgeoning areas of research; cancer, computational semantics and immunology to show how this game is implemented. The conclusion is that, with the possible exception of the USA, these national programs are a waste of taxpayers' money.
The second part of the talk attempts to find gaps in knowledge that small, economically distressed countries could exploit, It is argued that limits to “big data” and other brute force statistics approaches have been found. This part of the talk looks at how the elision of syntax and semantics have caused an asymptote in performance both in genomics and natural language processing; controversies in mainstream biology with its “central dogma” and why neuroscientists urgently need to master physics techniques like the harmonic oscillator
Thirdly, we look at conventional issues of “orphan” IP like books and drugs. The talk then briefly segues into issues of personal privacy
In the last section, we look at the current state of universities. It is argued that their disciplinary structure mimics the departmental weights assigned by science funding research after WW2. This has led to anomalies whereby popular subjects like cognitive science are relegated to the “interdisciplinary” category; indeed, in this vein, computer science was not taught as a major at Caltech until the 1980's. This opens up opportunities for the creation of online universities that use the myriad excellent freshman and sophomore foundation courses freely available on the web to create low-price majors in subjects currently ignored in the science, arts and humanities. The talk concludes by envisaging a way to do world-class education and research at a fraction of their current cost both to the student and taxpayer.
We had a really interesting audience and a discussion, which I recorded
The EU sent a representative;
The convenor was this guy;
This controversial and brilliant scientist had much to say;
finally, and perhaps best of all, one of the cog sci students now changing majors because of th absence of a dept there showed up, exemplifying one of the main themes